Free stories left to read

Airline Weekly subscribers get unlimited access to daily news and weekly issues.

Is the Korean Air-Asiana Merger Enough To Ease Asia’s Airline Glut?

Madhu Unnikrishnan
November 16th, 2020 at 1:23 PM EST

Are there too many fish in the Asian airline sea? That’s the question this week’s Airline Weekly Feature Story asked. And the answer came today with news that there may soon be one fewer fish, now that Korean Air seems poised to acquire beleaguered rival Asiana.

The news broke after the Korean Development Bank said it would invest more than $700 million in Korean Air’s parent company, Hanjin KAL. Korean Air said it will acquire Asiana for $1.8 billion. In a statement, Hanjin said Korea’s population couldn’t support two full-service airlines, putting its airline industry at a competitive disadvantage with countries like Germany, which has only one full-service carrier in Lufthansa.

No airline merger is simple, and this one won’t be, financially, operationally, and culturally. But both airlines are based in the same country and operate under the same laws and regulations and don’t have to worry about things like ownership and control, which has bedeviled other mergers.

This is one reason, of course, why the U.S. airline industry consolidated first in the early 2000s. Again, no merger is simple, but because no U.S. airline had to worry about ownership and control and meeting the requirements of different legal jurisdictions, the process was comparatively straightforward. The same holds somewhat true of European consolidation, helped by the EU’s single set of rules and regulations, but more complicated than in the U.S., because of the differing laws of each member state.

But Asia is completely different. As we argue in our Feature Story, consolidation within countries is possible and is happening, most recently with today’s news from Korea. Consolidation across borders is less likely to happen. But it’s not impossible. The weakness of several airlines in the region — Malaysia Airlines, Thai Airways, even AirAsia — could force governments to rethink transnational mergers.

The region’s airline overcapacity is not likely to subside soon even if a vaccine reignites international travel, given that most airlines are planning for a return to 2019 levels only by 2024. Even by 2019 levels, the Asia-Pacific region was over-served. So watch this space for if governments become more open to the transnational mergers the region needs.

Madhu Unnikrishnan
November 16th, 2020 at 1:23 PM EST

Photo credit:  Flickr / Tomas del Coro

Up Next


Why is Korean Air so Profitable? 

In part one, Gordon Smith and Jay Shabat discuss the factors delivering consistently strong results for Korean Air. In part two, we reveal the global airlines that were the most…
North America

What’s Going on at Southwest Airlines?

In part one, Gordon Smith and Jay Shabat discuss a fascinating week at Southwest, as the low-cost carrier navigates the challenges of a very vocal new activist investor. In part…

Captain Theresa Claiborne Interview

Captain Theresa Claiborne was the first black female pilot in the United States Air Force and joined United Airlines as its second-ever black female pilot. Last month, she retired from…

American Airlines and Southeast Asia

In part one of this week's specially extended episode, Gordon Smith and Jay Shabat discuss a dramatic few days at American Airlines. In part two, attention turns to Southeast Asia…
Low-Cost Airlines

Ryanair and U.S. Summer Trends

In part one of this Airline Weekly Lounge podcast, Gordon Smith and Jay Shabat discuss the latest earnings from low-cost giant Ryanair. In part two, our focus turns to the…

Special Offer: Choose From Quarterly or Annual Subscription Plans

2 of 3 free stories left to read

Already a subscriber? Login